Explaining Total Revenue in terms of Capital Expenditure, Current Expenditure and Value Added Tax: Albanian Case
Total Revenue is an important indicator of the economic wellbeing of a particular
country. As it is known government has revenue either by the taxes it collects from
society or by the investments it undertakes. This paper is interested in studying
the total revenue component for government and some of the factors that affect it.
The factors chosen in this paper are capital expenditure, current expenditure and
VAT (value added tax). The factors chosen here are a combination of investment
from government (including capital and current expenditure) and tax collection
(including VAT), which as stated before are the most important components for a
governments total revenue.
This paper is especially interested in the Albanian case and the interrelation among
the total revenue and the other three factors based on time series econometric model.
As a consequence it will be based more on econometrics, but without leaving behind
the economic interpretation of the results. It will be important to measure whether
these factors have a positive or negative impact in the total revenue; whether their
impact is statistically significant or not and whether they are sufficient indicators to
determine the actual values of total revenue.
Before taking into consideration all these econometric factors, an economic analysis
will be applied in the literature review section; and thereafter the economic
expectations and the actual results of the econometric model will be compared, and
by this way will be determined the validity of the model.
Keywords: Total Revenue, CAPEX, Current Expenditure, VAT, Econometric model,
Afonso, A. and Rault, C. (2009). Bootstrap panel Granger-causality between
government spending and revenue in the EU, The William Davidson Institute
Working Paper No. 944, January.
Bohn, H. (1991). Budget balance through revenue or spending adjustments?
Journal of Monetary Economics, 27, 333-359.
Chang, T.; Liu, W., Caudill, S. (2002). Tax-and-Spend, Spend-and-Tax, or Fiscal
Synchronization: New Evidence for Ten Countries, Applied Economics, 34(12),
Chang, Tsangyao and Chiang, Gengnan (2009) Revisiting the Government
Revenue-Expenditure Nexus: Evidence from 15 OECD Countries Based On the
Panel Data Approach. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 59(2): 165-172.
Ewing, B., Payne, J., Thompson, M., Al-Zoubi, O. (2006) Government expenditures
and revenues: evidence from asymmetric modeling, Southern Economic Journal,
Fasano, U., Wang, Q. (2002). Testing the relationship between government
spending and revenue: Evidence from GCC countries, IMF Working Paper
Folster S and M. Henrekso (1999), Growth Effects of Government Expenditure
and Taxation in Rich Countries, European Economic Review, 45: pp1501-1520
Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y. (2003) Testing For Unit Roots in Heterogeneous
Panels. Journal of Econometrics 115(1): 5374.
Kollias, C., Paleologou, S.M. (2006). Fiscal policy in the European Union: Tax
and spend, spend and tax, fiscal synchronization or institutional separation? Journal of Economic Studies, 33(2), 108-120.
Merrifield, J. (2000). State government expenditures determinants and tax
revenue determinants revisited, Public Choice, 102, 25-50.
Miller, S. and S. Frank (1990) Co-integration and Error-Correction Models:
The Temporal Causality between Government Taxes and Spending, Southern
Economic Journal, 57(1), 221- 229.
Payne, J. (1998). The tax-spend debate: Time series evidence from state budgets,
Public Choice, 95(3-4), 307-320.
Ram, R. (1988) Additional Evidence on Causality between Government Revenue
and Government Expenditures, Southern Economic Journal, 54(3), 763-769.
Von Furstenberg, G.M.R., Green, J., and J.H. Jeong (1986) Tax and Spend, or
Spend and Tax? Review of Economics and Statistics, 68, 179-188.
Whenkrofff, G.S. (2003). Value Added Tax in the Enlarge Command Market. 1st
edition, Association Business Programme, London.
- There are currently no refbacks.